Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions Debate
November 26, 2012
Be it resolved, the world cannot tolerate an Iran with nuclear weapons capability…
It has been rightly characterized as the toughest foreign policy challenge in a generation: how should the world respond to Iran’s nuclear ambitions? For some, the case for a preemptive strike on Iran is ironclad. An Iranian bomb would flood the volatile Middle East with nuclear weapons and trap Israel in a state of perilous insecurity—along with much of the world’s oil supply.
Others argue that a nuclear Iran could be the very stabilizing force that the region needs, as the threat of nuclear war makes conventional conflicts more risky. These same voices also ask: can the West and Israel afford to attack Iran when doing so could rollback the Arab Spring and re-entrench reactionary forces throughout the Middle East?
Results
Pre-debate
Post-debate
Swing: -2% (Con team win)
You may also like
October 21, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Putin’s hold over Trump and Pierre Poilievre makes a stunning accusation
October 30, 2025
– Watch
Two-State Solution Debate
October 28, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump’s trade tantrum and will Mark Carney’s first federal budget meet the moment?
November 6, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: an uninspiring budget and Carney’s government inches closer to a majority
November 19, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: The MAGA coalition is coming apart and Mark Carney’s government underwhelms voters
November 25, 2025
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Ottawa and Alberta find agreement on energy and why two-tier care is not the solution to Canada’s healthcare problems
January 6, 2026
– Listen
Munk Dialogue with Andrew Coyne: Trump’s hard power doctrine alienates allies and sets a destabilizing precedent
January 13, 2026
